He said the audience cheered him during the last debate; there was no audience. More than 111 former Republican officials call him “unfit to serve.” “…when you talk about the kind of numbers that I’m talking about…numbers nobody’s ever seen before…big beautiful numbers…but nobody’s eating bacon anymore…my uncle was a genius, so I really know numbers. Nobody knows more about numbers than I do…and boy, the windmills…” Time to take away the car keys. Don’t give him the nuclear codes.
I. Khider
He promised many things and did not deliver. If he does not deliver on a genocide, that’s all right by me. The dems delivered on genocide. Did they ever. Vibes.
David
Come on credit where credit is due, I am so tired of hearing “Trump does not deliver on his promises”…yes he didn’t build much of a wall…yes Mexico didn’t pay anything for what was built…yes he didn’t lockup Hillary, or Barack for birth certificate forgery, or Ted Cruz’s dad for his part in the JFK assassination…or deliver any infrastructure improvements…or ban muslims from entering the US…or get rid of affordable health care…or do anything towards a replacement…ok I admit he didn’t deliver on those promises. HOWEVER, genocide, that’s where I draw the line, Donald delivered the BIGGEST arms deal EVER, in the history of all arms deals to the Saudi’s who had killed or injured an estimated 19,196 Yemen civilians by March 2022…the US Congress even voted in 2019 to end US support for the Saudi war on Yemen (is it still a war when the other side isn’t really fighting…mmm?), but Trump strongly…powerfully…vetoed it. As you’d expect Joe put a stop to Donald’s good work once he came in…spoil sport…but as we know that the Saudi’s have invested $2 billion into Jared Kushner investment firm, I think we can confidently say Donald’s will be turning that tap back on once he’s back in the hot seat.
So please a bit of respect, the convicted sex offender is a former president!
I. Khider
The Gaza genocide is under the watch and full endorsement of the Dems. As is the invasion of Lebanon and upcoming invasion of Iran. A vote for the Dems means a populace endorsement of said policies. By not voting for the Dems, a message is then sent, ‘genocide is not cool’. In the UK, people won elections on that platform alone. If nothing else, a message needs to be sent: ‘endorse genocide and lose the presidency’. Definitely, life under Trump will be hard, but a world where pointless wars and atrocity are endorsed is worse.
David
The point your missing is Trump has no problem supporting genocide, (this is the same guy who is currently claiming 15,000 LEGAL US residents are in fact illegally in the country (false) and are eating cats and dogs (mind-numbingly false)). Trump doesn’t need to look overseas to support genocide, he’s more than happy to support homegrown.
So he will obviously throw his full support behind Benjamin Netanyahu (just like he sings the praises of Putin, Kim Jong Un, and of course Viktor Orbán), the only difference is his main goal will be to make himself or his family richer in the deal (as he did with the arms deal with the Saudi’s). He has also shown in the past that he is more than happy to antagonise the Iranians (or anyone for that matter) even if it goes against the UN or Nato.
40% of American who are eligible to vote don’t, so to pretend your not voting will somehow be heard and interpreted as ‘genocide is not cool’, is just ridiculous and deluded. Especially, when the person your no vote puts in power has shown more support for genocide and for tyrants.
If you want to make a difference write to your local senator, get out and protest, who is more likely to be swayed by protests, Donald or any one else on the planet?
I. Khider
Let me put this another way, who has the smaller body count? Unfortunately, it is Trump. You can always not vote or try for a third candidate (my preference). It just so happens that the lesser of evils in this election is Trump. Genocide is a red line. Between a babbling buffoon and one who is gleefully committing genocide, I’ll go with the former. Harris is not a viable option.
I. Khider
Bad as he is, the genocide is not under his watch.
DebsWasRight
He has promised to out genocide the current genociders.
“People get the government they deserve, and they deserve to get it good and hard.” – H.L. Menken
With only genocide on the ballot, we as a nation deserve what we get.
He said the audience cheered him during the last debate; there was no audience. More than 111 former Republican officials call him “unfit to serve.” “…when you talk about the kind of numbers that I’m talking about…numbers nobody’s ever seen before…big beautiful numbers…but nobody’s eating bacon anymore…my uncle was a genius, so I really know numbers. Nobody knows more about numbers than I do…and boy, the windmills…” Time to take away the car keys. Don’t give him the nuclear codes.
He promised many things and did not deliver. If he does not deliver on a genocide, that’s all right by me. The dems delivered on genocide. Did they ever. Vibes.
Come on credit where credit is due, I am so tired of hearing “Trump does not deliver on his promises”…yes he didn’t build much of a wall…yes Mexico didn’t pay anything for what was built…yes he didn’t lockup Hillary, or Barack for birth certificate forgery, or Ted Cruz’s dad for his part in the JFK assassination…or deliver any infrastructure improvements…or ban muslims from entering the US…or get rid of affordable health care…or do anything towards a replacement…ok I admit he didn’t deliver on those promises. HOWEVER, genocide, that’s where I draw the line, Donald delivered the BIGGEST arms deal EVER, in the history of all arms deals to the Saudi’s who had killed or injured an estimated 19,196 Yemen civilians by March 2022…the US Congress even voted in 2019 to end US support for the Saudi war on Yemen (is it still a war when the other side isn’t really fighting…mmm?), but Trump strongly…powerfully…vetoed it. As you’d expect Joe put a stop to Donald’s good work once he came in…spoil sport…but as we know that the Saudi’s have invested $2 billion into Jared Kushner investment firm, I think we can confidently say Donald’s will be turning that tap back on once he’s back in the hot seat.
So please a bit of respect, the convicted sex offender is a former president!
The Gaza genocide is under the watch and full endorsement of the Dems. As is the invasion of Lebanon and upcoming invasion of Iran. A vote for the Dems means a populace endorsement of said policies. By not voting for the Dems, a message is then sent, ‘genocide is not cool’. In the UK, people won elections on that platform alone. If nothing else, a message needs to be sent: ‘endorse genocide and lose the presidency’. Definitely, life under Trump will be hard, but a world where pointless wars and atrocity are endorsed is worse.
The point your missing is Trump has no problem supporting genocide, (this is the same guy who is currently claiming 15,000 LEGAL US residents are in fact illegally in the country (false) and are eating cats and dogs (mind-numbingly false)). Trump doesn’t need to look overseas to support genocide, he’s more than happy to support homegrown.
So he will obviously throw his full support behind Benjamin Netanyahu (just like he sings the praises of Putin, Kim Jong Un, and of course Viktor Orbán), the only difference is his main goal will be to make himself or his family richer in the deal (as he did with the arms deal with the Saudi’s). He has also shown in the past that he is more than happy to antagonise the Iranians (or anyone for that matter) even if it goes against the UN or Nato.
40% of American who are eligible to vote don’t, so to pretend your not voting will somehow be heard and interpreted as ‘genocide is not cool’, is just ridiculous and deluded. Especially, when the person your no vote puts in power has shown more support for genocide and for tyrants.
If you want to make a difference write to your local senator, get out and protest, who is more likely to be swayed by protests, Donald or any one else on the planet?
Let me put this another way, who has the smaller body count? Unfortunately, it is Trump. You can always not vote or try for a third candidate (my preference). It just so happens that the lesser of evils in this election is Trump. Genocide is a red line. Between a babbling buffoon and one who is gleefully committing genocide, I’ll go with the former. Harris is not a viable option.
Bad as he is, the genocide is not under his watch.
He has promised to out genocide the current genociders.
“People get the government they deserve, and they deserve to get it good and hard.” – H.L. Menken
With only genocide on the ballot, we as a nation deserve what we get.
Sorry, the reply is above.